/ Home \ / News \ / Contact Us \
 
| Home | People | Research | Publications | Opportunities |
Home arrow Publications arrow Meyer et al. 2005
Meyer et al. 2005
Implications of changes in riparian buffer protection for Georgia's trout streams. J.L. Meyer, K.L. Jones, G.C. Poole, C.R. Jackson, J.E. Kundell, B.L. Rivenbark, E.L. Kramer, W. Bumback. The University of Georgia, Athens. 2005.
  • Changes in riparian buffer regulations could greatly impact Georgia’s trout populations because approximately 60% of Georgia’s trout streams, including "primary" (streams likely to support reproducing trout populations) and large trout streams, are on private lands.
  • In stream segments where upstream riparian buffer widths are narrowed from 30 m to 15 m, analyses suggest: 1) Stream temperatures warm by over 2.9 deg F; 2) Fine sediment in riffle habitats increases by approximately 25% of the observed range in fine sediment; and 3) The biomass of trout indicative of reproductive success is reduced by over 81%.
  • Stream Map
    Distribution of stream in northeast Georgia with high, marginal, and low thermal habitat with 100 ft versus 50 ft wide buffers.
    With 100-ft riparian buffers, 63% of Georgia’s 2nd – 5th order trout stream segments are expected to maintain stream temperatures associated with a > 50% likelihood of supporting young-of-the-year trout. With 50-ft riparian buffers, this percentage drops to less than 9% (see map).
  • Because of existing deforestation, thermal alteration of the trout stream network has occurred and 33% of trout streams are estimated to be 2 - 5 deg F warmer than expected with a 100-ft buffer.  This pattern of thermal alteration is of concern because only 4 deg F seperates high and low quality trout habitat.
  • Headwater trout streams with drainage areas of 16 acres or less are exempt from current 50-ft riparian buffer regulations and can be piped 200 ft by individual landowners.
  • 41% of private lands in North Georgia drain into such streams.
  • Piping these streams will reduce habitat for aquatic organisms and drifting organisms supplied to downstream trout populations. The impact of this piping on downstream trout populations will be a function of its extent.

 Download Meyer et al. 2005 ExSummary
File Type:pdf
File Size:466.91Kb

 Download Meyer et al. 2005
File Type:pdf
File Size:3,412.24Kb

 
< Prev   Next >
Full Text
Please register and log in for access to full text publications.  Our policy is to maintain your privacy.
 





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Publication Types
All Publications
Journal Articles
Book Chapters
Theses & Reports
© Eco-metrics, Inc. 2000-2006 all rights reserved